Play
Ithaca's Real Rock Radio Station
Email
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
advertisement | your ad here
Honda of Ithaca - 2010
Scattered Clouds
60° - Scattered Clouds
 
 
The Great Momentum Debate Round 4
ama72@cornell.edu
| May 20, 2009
2comments
Add Your Voice
So the debate has raged to an intense level among WVBR sportscasters debating the question of whether momentum exists in baseball. I decided to take a statistical approach to find a solution to the answer. Based on tools and time, my study is not perfect (I will point that out right away), but it is very thorough and reproducible (if someone wants the data, let me know). Research: Here is an interesting article that proves there might be momentum from [[link|url=http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2005/10/24/10107/273]]Beyond the Boxscore[[end-link]] , a blog dedicated to the study of statistics and baseball. Article opposing momentum from the Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119093290865641816.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal. And of course, the debates of WVBR sportscasters [[link|url=http://wvbr.com/sportsblog/393]] Jay Sage [[end-link]], [[link|url=http://wvbr.com/sportsblog/394]] Eugene Karlik [[end-link]], and [[link|url=http://wvbr.com/sportsblog/395]] Rahul Desai [[end-link]]. Method: I decided to try and find some way to obtain data that would somehow help determine if momentum existed. I decided to look to see if there was some sort of correlation of finishing the season strongly and performing well in the post-season. I gathered all of the overall winning percentages of every team (N = 112) that has made the post-season during the wild-card era. I also obtained the splits of winning percentage before September and the regular season winning percentage in September and October. After obtaining the data, I performed numerous tests to determine independence between several factors of my data, and I determined based on a 95% confidence interval that the winning percentage of a team before September and the difference in winning percentage after September 1 would be the factors I would use. I called them PRE and DIF. I performed several ordinal regression tests to see if the factors PRE, DIF, and their INTERACTION had any affect on team’s PROGRESS in the playoffs. Results: I first performed an ordinal logistic regression test involving the PRE, DIF, and INTERACTION. The Person Goodness-of-Fit test (p = .318) seemed to suggest that the full model did in fact fit the data. Upon closer review, none of the effects seemed to be significant based on a 95% confidence interval: DIF (p=.110), PRE (p=.078), and INTERACTION (.103). I decided to drop INTERACTION and perform another ordinal regression using only PRE and DIF. Also INTERACTION had a lower p-value than DIF, I felt that for the purpose of this study, DIF would be easier to interpret. Again, the Pearson Goodness-of-Fit test (p = .490) suggested that the model did fit the data. Also, the Log-Likelihood test (2.80 < 3.84) allowed me to use the reduced model. Unfortunately, the reduced model only using DIF (p = .696) and PRE (p = .141) both indicated that neither indicator was significant in determining post-season success. I decided to drop the DIF variable because of its very large p-value and see if there was any significance just using just PRE. Again, this reduced model passed the Pearson Goodness-of-Fit test (p=.119) and the Log-Likelihood test (2.95 < 5.99). This time, the main effect PRE was significant (p = .041) at with 95% confidence. It had an odds-ration of 0.00028 and a coefficient of -8.169. After determining the relationship between pre-September winning percentage and post-season success, the next logical step would be to look at overall winning percentage and post-season success. I performed an ordinal logistic regression model using just OVERALL, which is the winning percentage of overall winning percentage of all the playoff teams and post-season success. I found out that overall winning percentage (p = 0.098) was actually insignificant using a 95% confidence interval. Discussion: Despite pre-September winning percentage having significance with a 95% confidence interval, the overall winning percentage suggested otherwise. This is only a 95% confidence interval, which means there is some error. Both the p-values for PRE and OVERALL were extremely close to 5%, so it is a matter of what one feels comfortable at being confident. Both are not overwhelmingly confident, but both are not so large that they should be ignored. If one really wants to be correct, ignore these factors when the playoffs come around. If one wants to see a very loose general trend, using the coefficients for OVERALL (-7.975) or PRE would not be a bad determinate. The biggest limitation in this study was independence. Unfortunately when you look at team winning percentages, each team is related to another because the winning percentage is based on how one team performs against another team. Also, with playoffs, each team has to face each other, which was a problem I knew going into the study. The large N size of 112 teams did a good job reducing the dependence for this factor, but it is impossible for complete independence. If I were to perform this study again, I would look at American League and National League performance separately and see if there was some sort of relationship between each league’s results. Conclusion: Based on my results, it would appear that a hot September does not have an effect on playoff success. Based on my some research and my own empirical observations, once a team makes it to the playoffs, the results are random. All teams that make it to the playoffs have to be talented, and winning a short series involves a lot of luck that would otherwise be minimalized if each team played a whole season of 162 games against each other. Personal Opinion: Although there are a lot of flaws to my little study, it did exemplify some of my own personal beliefs on the subject of momentum in baseball. Baseball is a game of 25 players each doing one’s own part. Players do go on hot streaks and others go on cold streaks. I would agree with Jay that there is individual momentum. One play could get an individual into a groove and one play could ruin one’s game for awhile. As for team momentum though, I am a non-believer. In my opinion, everyone’s individual momentum balances out to the basics of whether a team is talented or not. Although there might be some positive and negative momentum based on individuals, the sum is so minimal that is has very little impact on a team.
Share Your Thoughts
ama72@cornell.edu from WVBR | May 20, 2009, 1:44pm
Rahul, that is true, but again I was looking at momentum from a team aspect, which accounts for all these changes in the difference in September and October (which is why I decided to look at these records). Who is playing is not independent of team success, but are independent of team momentum. Examplesof teams without momentum that did well in the playoffs or teams with momentum that bombed: 1997 Marlins went 12-15 in September almost blowing the wild card to the Mets. The 2001 Oakland Athletics were 23-4 in September, the best record among playoff teams since 1995, and lost in the first round. Only 6 of the 16 teams with a record of .700 or better made it to the second round of the playoffs, while 10 of the 17 teams with a .500 or worse September record made it to the second round. What is even more interesting is that the teams that were "hot" (as in had a better September winning percentage than pre-september winning percentage) did not have a significantly different amount of chance of advancing in the post-season than teams that were not hot. Based on a Pearson Chi Scquare Test, the difference was insignificant if you looking at 99% confidence. That means that a team had a 50% chance of advancing in the playoffs regardless of how the team performed in September, thus adding to the randomness of October.

Rahul | May 20, 2009, 1:21am
Very interesting. There are some other problems with comparing September records and postseason records. 1) The teams that postseason teams face in October are better than the teams they face in September. 2) The teams have different compositions in those two months. In September, rosters are 40-men deep with 5-man starting rotations. In the postseason, teams use 3 or 4 man rotations with 25-man rosters. 3) Finally, a lot of teams clinch their playoff berth with 10+ games left and coast through the rest of the season. They'll rest their relievers, give their starters shorter hooks, and let their rookies and reserves play. Once again, the team on the field in September isn't necessarily the team on the field in October. I hate to invoke empirical examples here, but there are instances of teams coming in to the postseason on terrible losing streaks turning it on in the postseason. The 2000 Yankees went 3-15 to close the season before beating the Mets in the World Series. The 2006 Cardinals snuck into the playoffs with a 3-8 record in their final 11 games en route to a World Series title. These examples seem to debunk the theory of momentum. Great job, Adam.
Name
Town
Please enter the text seen in the image below:
Note: Comments by logged in Rock n' Roll Nation users will appear immediately. All others must be approved by a moderator.

WVBR is the Voice of the Big Red, bringing you the latest news and insight from the Cornell and professional sports worlds. From 93-Second Sports Shots to game updates and summaries to the latest team and player transactions and news, you'll find the latest expert analysis right here from the WVBR Sports team.

Sports Blog Main

1 & 1 Hosting
Most Popular Posts
Big Red Blogroll
Gas Gauge
advertisement | your ad here
Perrywinkles Jewelry